Menu

A new ball revival offers LSG a template, even in defeat

Deepu Narayanan 
prince-yadav-picked-up-2-20-in-three-overs
Prince Yadav picked up 2-20 in three overs ©BCCI/IPL

The first year of a new IPL cycle tends to be the hardest, with tentative combinations and fluid role clarity that often arrives only after a string of missteps. For Lucknow Super Giants, 2025 was emblematic of that churn. Injuries to their fast bowlers stripped them of continuity, and while the top order carried their weight, the campaign drifted to a seventh-place finish. The fault line was clear - Powerplay bowling.

Lucknow's Powerplay bowling average of 49.72 and economy rate of 10.65 were the worst in IPL 2025. The underlying metrics painted an equally stark picture. A false shot percentage of 16.1 was also the lowest, meaning they were neither threatening edges nor inducing indecision. Just 18 wickets in 14 games in this phase underlined the absence of control and penetration.

Powerplay stats in IPL 2025

TeamMatWktsAvgERFalse Shot %
LSG141849.7210.6516.1
SRH142042.0510.0118.1
DC131646.569.5519.7
MI162633.579.0920.9
KKR132035.559.1121.5
PBKS172338.959.2321.6
RR141648.129.1622.8
RCB152728.558.5623.2
CSK142039.859.4823.8
GT151945.219.5426.9

The off-season response was swift and targeted. The appointment of Bharat Arun as bowling coach, fresh off a title-winning stint with KKR less than 15 months ago, signaled an intent to rebuild the bowling identity. That was followed by the trade-in of Mohammed Shami from SRH. Arun had overseen India's rise into a formidable pace-bowling unit, a period that coincided with Shami's transformation to his optimal best. The alignment was as much tactical as it was intuitive.

Conditions in Lucknow offered immediate assistance to this reimagined attack. The red soil surface, with its natural carry, brought the seamers into play. In this game, Lucknow's false shot percentage of 37.2 was their highest ever at home and a sharp departure from the previous season. Shami set the tone, operating at a false-shot percentage of 40 in his first spell, probing the batters with his skiddy pace.

Around him, there were signs of a more rounded attack taking shape. Mohsin Khan, when fit, remains a rare asset: left-arm angle, steep bounce, and movement. Playing his first competitive game since 2025, his dismissal of Nitish Rana was a reminder of what he offers when those attributes align.

More intriguing, though, was the evolution of Prince Yadav. That he was preferred over more established options like Avesh Khan and Mayank Yadav spoke of the layers he has added to his game. Last season, he operated largely in the middle and death overs, leaning on his ability to hit fuller lengths and reverse the ball. Here, he adapted. Not a single delivery in his opening spell was overpitched; instead, he lived on a good length, hitting it nine times to account for Pathum Nissanka and Axar Patel, the latter dismissal, off a five-over-old ball that jagged back into the left-hander, showcasing his newer skillsets.

Prince Yadav by lengths in IPL 2025

LengthBallsWktsAvgER% balls
Full67331.338.4248.9%
Good200NA10.2014.6%
Short500NA11.6436.5%

LSG seamers in Powerplay by lengths vs Delhi Capitals

LengthBallsWktsAvgER
Full0NANANA
Good2541.501.44
Short110NA8.72

Lucknow won the Powerplay convincingly, but the game slipped away in the middle overs, where the attack lost its edge, particularly after the Impact Sub was cashed on Shahbaz Ahmed, leaving Digvesh Rathi on bench for the night. Yet, zooming out, this performance hinted at a viable template in home conditions: attack early with seam, leverage the surface, and trust a top order capable of absorbing pressure against pace. For a side at the start of a new cycle, that sense of direction can be as valuable as the result itself.

© Cricbuzz